Creative Writing and Critical Thinking

Lydia Amir’s Taking Philosophy Seriously.

Lydia Amir is a professor of philosophy whose mainstreaming for her works have always been some sort of a challenge to the philosophical state of mind; in accordance with the modern world, that is today, in her Taking Philosophy Seriously (2018), you shall be reading what I’ve managed to peruse the very lowdown of her thoughts on such grandeur of clash in between Philosophy and Academia in the abstract.

In the continuum of Lydia Amir’s Taking Philosophy Seriously the book that ravaged my very point of view for the clash of academia and practical philosophy quite pleasantly, I find it quite requisite to cross-examine her point of view in accordance with my caliber of the Radical philosophy as she pointed to it, and though she still extricated the very antinomy of academia and practical philosophy; as in the daily life philosophy, she still extricated yet the points tackled on account of a perspective and a standpoint; that is to say, Lydia has managed to point out some issues related to philosophers those in the field, a situation where practitioners aren’t so fond of their vocation that is philosophy, and for that they are to be found quite smitten over such a tremendously magnificent job; and that is teaching philosophy.

According to Lydia whose aphorism on Taking Philosophy Seriously came over with a strong intuitive point of view, a material such as philosophy despite its orientation whether Radical or Meriolistic, still for the pristine practitioner to take their infatuation with philosophy quite loosely, and rather emulate what an earlier sense of a breakthrough just seemed to provide the leastways of an impact, a dictum and a staunchly platform that would truthfully and though in the realm of academia; still would gnash the contradistinction of academia and philosophy’s multi-faceted orientated fixations, and by this point, the professional caliber of philosophy has never had any given potholes, New Age theories as Lydia precisely stated or any of the myriad issues that seemingly trudged against philosophy for some personal benefits, gains, credits and especially universal accolades.

And still for any sort of practitioners and of various fixated orientations to steer their perspective, standpoint unto the path and the pattern that please their intuitive calibers since philosophy as that is maintained within academia does come to stand its ground upon the relativity and relevance of researches made upon a sense of a breakthrough, a modern theory despite its coming, a definite and an absolute sense of a very ceremonious thievery from psychological patterns and hence sociological division and its behavioural aspects; Lydia still bounced back to provide not just one distinctive elucidation to be her gentrified affection with the subject matter of Taking Philosophy Seriously upon the grounds of academia, she even evaluated two figures of a very behemoth caliber of philosophy itself, the Radical philosophy or as pointed to Perfectionism, and the Democrated philosophy, the one known as Meliorism, in this respect of Lydia’s rich dictums on both of them, I do not wish to state what she managed to prune the best examples of her discussion; there were several aphorisms said by great thinkers and philosophers and she shared their thoughts so grandiloquently compatible in accordance with her points, those whose profession varied from the academic orientation as drastic as it is in getting about to fetch the top priority of some hardly perceived confrontations in general, the sheer act of philosophizing in bravery and true grit of the truest of all universal calibers of life’s epidemic existence which brings about radicalism onto philosophy in a delicate deference, and those that Lydia mentioned were great philosophers of a very multi-faceted division in philosophy; in the abstract, Arhtur Shopenhauer, Friedrich Nitzsche, Søren  Kierkegaard, Benedict Spionza and that of George Santayana.

So upon universal regulations and what many old and new figures have managed to proceed the torch of the universal philosophy upon all elaborate and unceremonious in dictating the massive respects of life’s inclined sense of steering; and thus unto a probable breakthrough.

 Radical Philosophy: Perfectionism

According to the universal caliber of the very bravely rich and massively drenched in grand reasoning section of philosophy, or so as the Radical one always referred to as the Perfectionist philosophy, Lydia when accordance are bid to her, she stated in her Taking Philosophy Seriously that the philosophers as old or new practitioners must have bargained a figure of plain and sheer perception of self-importance before teaching that caliber of the Perfectionist philosophy, for that Radical philosophy is quite rich and too behemoth to be universally gauged in accordance with man’s mindsets, knowing that Lydia insisted on the lack of teaching such things by practitioners who would come short on accepting the factoid about themselves being a bunch of sage, a minority that had about a free and a lavishly personified vision upon the aspects of life; qualities such as truth, happiness, freedom in its vast interpretations, value and especially the solitude of thoughts without them being shared on account of the excessively shared interdisciplinary backgrounds, and notwithstanding the vitality of the prolific characterization of the Radical philosophy, to Lydia it is a behemoth respect in the tradition figure of thinking and thus is a judicious panel of thoughts throughout time.

Lydia is a firm believer that the Radical philosophy is a means of a reconciling revivification to the academic contradistinctions of threading the path through philosophy in general; only to get some of the lofty knowledge that is limitless and timeless as the universe in the hand of the Supreme Being, yet still for such a tradition of the Perfectionism in laying tremendous grounds of a staunchly capacity of potency of philosophizing with courage, and with unprecedented and uncompromising sense of withdrawal from fear and proceeding with the nuggets of humility, knowledge and radical decency above all the meaningful weaponry of a Radical respect in the universally behemoth philosophy of Perfectionism.

Lydia nevertheless added some far more reconciling points to the old Radical respect as being modernized and the sort out renewed and updated through the imagery of Existentialism, Jean-Paul Sartre and Camus, as they would be mirandized over their crime of the massive success they gained by digging from every single direction of the interdisciplinary grounds of thoughts, orientations and thus philosophical resorts and then mindsets, as for that; the crime is complete acts of revival to the Radical philosophy, a point such as this would add greater evaluations to Lydia’s Taking Philosophy Seriously and rather candid elucidation of the semi happening plateau of academia and philosophy, the researcher urged that an academe’s interest in Perfectionism is being revived; herein, the story of the drab academia as I happened to think of it quite authentically is that it will always be the lackadaisically short-on-so-much platform which in spite of its sophistication of formality and modulation in countenance; it still craves and longs for the universally perceived to be the undying aspect in the vast globe philosophy, the one objective and subjective in its respect of viewing each momentum of thoughts’ normalcy and sophistication, and herein to Lydia’s notion on such an aphorism, she reckoned respectfully every bit of dereliction that academia and philosophy would somewhat come upon and did come about once upon a time.

Most of the Taking Philosophy Seriously book’s elucidation have tackled vaster and more entangled in pristine time and old one several cases that in listless conceit, studied and cross-examined the growth of philosophy over the wing of the modern acts of philosophizing on account of modest, stylistic and rather shallow aspects of succour from Modernism, Psychology, New Age theories, Sociology, revived and conventional practices and thus of spiritual origins those who associated their works to the Radical philosophy; or Perfectionism.

Democratized Philosophy: Meliorism

In the groundbreaking regulations of the Meliorism’s philosophy, the standards to which the very origins of the Meliorist are of sheer lackadaisical disposition, it is the more indulged in the sort out of a philosophy that is pretty modern to be accommodated to the radical one; and as Lydia stated several times in each aphorism she universally jotted down, a less ambitious and more of a common sense so much to the standardized modern mindset to come up with, and so of the psychological needs that require a certain realm of more unfolding researches, foundations, traditions of a thread for philosophy to walk and a sense of a breakthrough to be stirred to as universally as possible. And upon universal notions such as Truth, Liberation and Wisdom prolifically stated in Lydia’s book; those are some elaborate points out of many, those many in what would be immersed into man’s standards of morality, decadence and thus absolute freedom of thoughtfulness, and though fixated upon certain mindsets; it is a matter for the less hectic Meliorism of far more updated developments of not just fundamentally unfolded cases like New Age theories, Psychology, Modernism and myriad of many practices; those quite prevalent in the philosophy of the Perfectionism yet with several compromises of the very philosophers themselves once instructing for many brilliant reasoning, it is in fact of an endeavour for the least provided; is yet to be searched in grandiloquent assessment and thus flamboyantly modern clarity of discussing the modern situations. Lydia’s fixated mindset on the this case of the Democratized Meriolism is her head start of paving the path for Epistemology, the such behemoth aspect in philosophy that failed not to argue, entail and elicit none but splendiferous account to the matter of philosophical epiphanies to the plateau of philosophy in the abstract, and the point of the writer was to merely lie the solid grounds of philosophy’s backbone of thoughtfulness, and that is epistemological views, grounds and most significantly thread of work upon societal and social issues, the traditional and those of unconventional obscurities and intellectual virtues, and to philosophy itself; philosophical practitioners and scholars too, are to an uncertain extent of greatly valuable productivity of philosophizing over all that is knowledge, intellectuality and thus a virtue of a universal handling; yet within restricted foundations of a more driven onto social obscurities and hence the Practical Philosophy of what a societal boundaries a craft that has managed to find solutions for throughout the excess of simply, common sense, and for that reason, Lydia pointed out to knowledge as “ Intelligent Development “, as such ground is to be associated to the capacity of adopting additional or alternative points of view, and surely taken from Jean Piaget’s work of The Development of Thought (1932), lest unmentioned when Lydia encompassed her very virtue of epistemic and personal epiphany upon her motor of  “philosophic” mindset, and so as the academe who is a researcher, a philosopher and a literati so as truth be told upon the very grounds of philosophy in general, the idea of perseverance and determination and especially courage are of basic foundations in the success of a particular society, a society that is unkempt of rabid and too downgrading rules, regulations and traditions of the seemingly Practical Philosophy that is so far Melioristic, it does not blow off steam unless coming up with a refrained plateau of philosophizing upon three main tackles; or tools.

Appropriating abstract thought in practice:

The extent to which one’s philosophizing upon the behemoth grounds of philosophy, is merely to get a hold of the aphorisms and dictums entailed to one’s mindset; as eventually practiced with some sense of limits to the vicinity of the Practical Philosophy has to offer of austere, complicated yet implausibly practical sense of elucidations to any given case of discussions.  

 Fostering intellectual virtues:

The extent to which a morality, a decadence and a hindrance of those two entitled standardized etiquettes; is none but the austerely enriched grounds of intellectual virtues as when entailed and immersed within one’s mindset, they get to relinquish every bit of an empty dire need to the lackadaisical and most significantly feeble grounds of morality once excessively questioned by the depth of philosophy, and so far when associated with philosophizing; a societal zenith or nadir for instance, is tremendously bound by the hyped virtues laid by man’s efforts, bravery and ire in craving for difference; and that is of the sacrificial points for a man to ascertain, consequently and as vague as it may seem when such a matter is gauged upon the ideals of intellectuality; morality and decadence are three points of unfinished business with any society’s brave sense of wishfulness; the things to be accomplished and thus fulfilled with or without limits, and since philosophy in general is quite abstract and suits so much the remnants of thoughtfulness upon any mindset; a bad and a good one, there happened to be Modern views for the caliber of intellectual virtues to stupefy those of Melioristic philosophy and help lead its path quite regularly more insipid in elaborating and steering certain points in philosophizing for the sake of virtues of intellectuality.

Developing more encompassing feelings through moral virtues:

The extent to which the tension of Freedom and Equality to any society as Lydia added, is the actual plague to any democratic and liberal society, as this is quite valid and of immense credibility to modern day; and pretty precise to the very backbone of Meliorism, the Democratized Philosophy, is that entailing requisite purposes and views such as the momentum of a nonchalant society and that of an ignoramus leader, is just the right deed that the philosophy of the Meliorist has successfully entangled the modern outlook of common sense, and thus without being too ambiguous in accrediting for the account of vague yet universally united points to tackle in whatever philosophy is available for the mindset to argue and make volitional processing about, it is autonomous virtues and unfolding pristine; and rather renewed capacities of some unabating and unswerving universal capacities for a time of recurring foundations, and they are quite as regular as ever perfect in accordance with the excess of deeds of humanity once depraved of the leastways logic gauged by the suitable philosophy that accommodates some sense of practicability, comprehensiveness and thus courage in determining the very needful explanation for and of a societal zenith, a nadir and a fixated orientation that desired to have happened to bring ultimate philosophy to and yet stopped in a resort where neutralization became a better tool than philosophy itself, and that is the philosophy of Meriolism.

Show More


Greetings, My name is Sofiane, I am a Theorist, a Philosopher and an enthusiastic writer of several fields, and pretty much the sphere of Literature and its vast aspects such as Creative Writing and Critical Thinking wholeheartedly, this Blog is yet an example of what our community can provide to the world with the cornerstone of bursting to the colossus of intellectuality vigorously.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button